iOverlander 2

iOverlander 2

A database of places for overlanders. Find & share your next destination.

App info


2.3.91
April 15, 2025
Teen
Get iOverlander 2 for Free on Google Play

Advertisement

App description


Android App Analysis and Review: iOverlander 2, Developed by iOverlander LLC. Listed in Travel & local Category. Current Version Is 2.3.91, Updated On 15/04/2025 . According to users reviews on Google Play: iOverlander 2. Achieved Over 167 thousand Installs. iOverlander 2 Currently Has 1 thousand Reviews, Average Rating 3.8 Stars

iOverlander is a database of places for overlanders and travelers. It includes camping, hotels, restaurants, mechanics, water, propane filling and many other categories. Details are listed for each place, including amenities, photos, date last visited and GPS coordinates.

In addition to finding places, you can add new places, leave reviews, save favorites, and share places with other travelers. All of these features will work offline. Upgrade to iOverlander Pro or Unlimited to download maps, to be able to view points on maps even when you are out of cell range.

iOverlander is an app built for Overlanders, by Overlanders. It has been tested in dozens of countries and across tens of thousands of miles.

So what are you waiting for? Start exploring with iOverlander today!
We are currently offering version 2.3.91. This is our latest, most optimized version. It is suitable for many different devices. Free download directly apk from the Google Play Store or other versions we're hosting. Moreover, you can download without registration and no login required.

We have more than 2000+ available devices for Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, Motorola, LG, Google, OnePlus, Sony, Tablet ... with so many options, it’s easy for you to choose games or software that fit your device.

It can come in handy if there are any country restrictions or any restrictions from the side of your device on the Google App Store.

What's New


- Landscape mode now available on Android
- Favorites are sorted by distance to your location
- New premium map options: Satellite and dark maps
- Access maps from the main Explore screen
- Fix bug where editing a check-in was deleting the last few characters
- Increase timeout on offline map downloads to prevent timeouts if signal drops
- Various localization fixes for Spanish and Portuguese

Rate and review on Google Play store


3.8
1,205 total
5 62.4
4 5.9
3 3.8
2 2.9
1 25.0

Total number of ratings

Total number of active users rated for: iOverlander 2

Total number of installs (*estimated)

Estimation of total number of installs on Google Play, Approximated from number of ratings and install bounds achieved on Google Play.

Recent Comments

user
Dustin

Absolutely terrible now, they want 60 dollars to be able to download more than one area on the map see things in more than one state. They say it's due to size but each region is like 2-4mb so not that big. I travel from AZ to Utah and Nevada, so you have to download one state, then delete every time. I would be willing to pay a few bucks to have permanent access to the states I need tops, definitely not a subscription.

user
Dylan J. Cole

I get that the business model was unsustainable, and they needed to start charging for the app. What I don't understand is why iOverlander 2 is so clunky and ugly compared with the straightforward and utilitarian original version. Then again, I feel this way about oh so many tech updates... somehow slowly making what was once straightforward into an experience that is much more confusing and difficult for the user.

user
Joshua

I see a lot of improvement in this new version! I like the functionality a lot. It's a lot less finicky and cumbersome. The UI has vastly improved. As others has stated downloading areas in the map is not ideal however I understand why this was done. Advertisments aren't too intrusive, I understand the Dev needs to support the app somehow. I look forward to seeing how this app improves in the future.

user
Ron Gurowitz

Update, they must have improved things since I last tried to use it. Interface is fine. I'd pay for it but, not $60/$100 that's a lot more than Gaia. If it was like the legacy version I would pay $30 maybe as much as 50but it would have to be good. 60/100 a year would make it one of my most expensive apps and the most expensive one that relies entirely on user's information. It's not like we're getting copywrited materials

user
Cody Manhard

Absolute nose dive for the app. No new features other than ads and incredibly restrictive map system. For $60 a year you can only view 3 states! It costs $100 to view them all. For a user driven platform this is disgustingly greedy. It's clear they're trying to copy the onx business model. I would ask the developer to take a honest look at those apps and justify paying MORE for their nearly featureless app. If they first app comes down I'll never use this platform again.

user
Eniko Nagy

Would be ok if they just kept the map browsing feature as it is in the original all. But now it requires to download a region and you can only browse that region. Major step back. Also, the old app used Google maps so it shows shops/restaurants etc that is useful for context. The new app uses something else, that has no details. ** In response to the developer: I never faced a challenge with points loading, and didn't feel they needed to be available offline. I will continue using the old app.

user
Alex Robinson (akr900)

I was finally able to get locations to download, but this still seems like a poor design choice. Downloading a specific location seems to be so you can have offline use of the locations as other states show data even without being downloaded. I'd recommend that when first opening the app it guides the user directly to the download locations page, this will probably help prevent more negative reviews due to confusion of this design.

user
Mike Dempsey

Essentially unusable. Was genuinely excited when I saw there was a new app and downloaded it. That excitement immediately vanished after a few minutes trying to use it. Seems as though you guys didn't do any user research before building this and then did no usability testing before launching.